F-105 vs Su-17

Cold war, Korea, Vietnam, and Desert Storm - up to and including for example the A-10, F-15, Mirage 200, MiG-29, and F-18.
Banned
 
Posts: 26
Joined: 21 Oct 2009, 00:12

by pfo » 12 Jul 2017, 23:18

Who would win?


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 5912
Joined: 22 Jul 2005, 03:23

by sferrin » 13 Jul 2017, 04:26

F-105
"There I was. . ."


User avatar
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
 
Posts: 505
Joined: 16 Jun 2016, 10:38

by saberrider » 13 Jul 2017, 09:56

F 105 variant with maneuver flaps.


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1753
Joined: 28 Feb 2008, 02:33

by outlaw162 » 13 Jul 2017, 15:15

Ah yes, the classic knifefight in a phonebooth.


Elite 3K
Elite 3K
 
Posts: 3157
Joined: 02 Feb 2014, 15:43

by basher54321 » 13 Jul 2017, 18:42

Might need a big phonebooth for these 2.


Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 6012
Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 01:24
Location: Nashua NH USA

by sprstdlyscottsmn » 13 Jul 2017, 19:58

The F-105 had more gun kills in 'Nam than all other US aircraft combined, and it was a bomber.
"Spurts"

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic
-FMS Systems Engineer
-PFD Systems Engineer
-PATRIOT Systems Engineer


Elite 1K
Elite 1K
 
Posts: 1753
Joined: 28 Feb 2008, 02:33

by outlaw162 » 14 Jul 2017, 00:23

big phonebooth


Yeah, more like a telemarketer call center. I think a maneuvering fight between these two would probably look like the mating ritual of two sperm whales (is there such thing as a female sperm whale?....must be).

I believe most (not all) of the guys that got the 27.5 gun kills were ex-F-100 drivers who had overcome the mindset that they could turn inside a Cessna 150. These were really good drivers.

To be fair however, the SU-17/20/22s are credited with a C-130 & an A-37.

The winner(s) would be the guys on the ground that weren't being bombed while these two mixed it up.


Banned
 
Posts: 1293
Joined: 23 Dec 2014, 09:25

by arian » 14 Jul 2017, 02:34

pfo wrote:Who win?


Win at what? Bombing?

The F-105 is about a generation earlier than the Su-17 in timeline: late 50s design vs. late 60s design. And early Su-17s were quite crummy in their intended role of air-to-ground until the M3 and M4 versions of the late 70s early 80s made them competitive.

F-105 had much higher payload and range, and much higher practical payload and range given the use of in-flight refueling. They're not really comparable planes in concept, or otherwise, even if they were used for the same purpose. But F-105 was an amazing plane, especially given the time.


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 28404
Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
Location: Australia

by spazsinbad » 21 Oct 2017, 03:09

For gummybears and anyone interested in flight manuals for the F-105 series: http://aviationarchives.blogspot.com.au/

Republic F-105B Flight Manual:
https://www.filefactory.com/file/60o4g1 ... Manual.pdf (57Mb)
&
Republic F-105F Flight Manual:
https://www.filefactory.com/file/4pldph ... Manual.pdf (63Mb)


Active Member
Active Member
 
Posts: 147
Joined: 06 Apr 2020, 15:01

by nastle » 06 Apr 2020, 15:24

interesting comparison
we rarely think about it but in an actual war , a fight between 2 strike fighters or fighter-bombers is not entirely unheard of.Esp since these are the kind of aircraft most commonly deployed , in a big war esp over a small battlefield it is more than likely they can cross paths

I believe both f-105/su-17 can win depending on who is carrying an offensive load of weapons and who achieves surprise


User avatar
Elite 5K
Elite 5K
 
Posts: 28404
Joined: 05 May 2009, 21:31
Location: Australia

by spazsinbad » 14 May 2023, 06:18

OPERATION SPRING HIGH [8 page PDF attached]
Nov 2018 MARK CARLSON

"THE FIRST ATTACK AGAINST NORTH VIETNAMESE SA-2 MISSILE SITES DEVOLVED INTO A DEBACLE OF DUMMY TARGETS AND DOWNED AIRCRAFT, BUT IT FORCED MILITARY LEADERS TO FIND WAYS TO COUNTER THE NEW THREAT BY MARK CARLSON

PHOTO: LOADED FOR BEAR A Republic F-105D carries a full conventional bomb load approaching 7 tons. On July 27, 1965, an F-105 strike force targeted two SA-2 missile sites with a mixed bag of napalm and cluster munitions.”


Source: Aviation History Nov 2018 Vol.29, No.2
Attachments
F-105D Op Spring High Aviation History Nov 2018 PRN pp8.pdf
(2.55 MiB) Downloaded 107 times
F-105D Op Spring High Aviation History Nov 2018.jpg


Elite 2K
Elite 2K
 
Posts: 2582
Joined: 12 Jan 2014, 19:26

by charlielima223 » 17 May 2023, 22:22

Disgusting and sad...

Time index 42:50


Still boils my blood! :bang:



Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests