F-15EX new name

Military aircraft - Post cold war aircraft, including for example B-2, Gripen, F-18E/F Super Hornet, Rafale, and Typhoon.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

tbarlow

Senior member

Senior member

  • Posts: 412
  • Joined: 05 Nov 2007, 00:35
  • Location: San Antonio, Tx

Unread post07 Apr 2021, 17:54

https://www.military.com/daily-news/202 ... le-ii.html

It's Official: The Air Force's New F-15EX Fighter Will Be Called the Eagle II

7 Apr 2021
Military.com | By Oriana Pawlyk
The Air Force's new F-15EX fourth-plus generation fighter has been named the Eagle II in a salute to its predecessor, the F-15 Eagle, officials said during an unveiling ceremony Wednesday.

The announcement was made by Lt. Gen. Mike Loh, Air National Guard director; Lt. Gen. Duke Richardson, military deputy for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics; and Leanne Caret, president and chief executive officer of Boeing Defense, Space & Security at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, where the first F-15EX is undergoing test and evaluation.

"The arrival of these aircraft is very timely," Loh said during the ceremony. "We must ensure that we have the most capable combat aircraft defending our shores during this time of great power competition." Air Force fighters including the F-15, F-16 Fighting Falcon and the F-22 Raptor often are tasked with addressing airspace violations and intercepting aircraft approaching U.S. airspace.

The F-15EX is the service's first fourth-generation fighter program in more than 20 years.

The Boeing-made fighter completed its maiden flight at St. Louis Lambert International Airport, Missouri, in February.
Following the successful flight, the Air Force accepted the first F-15EX at Eglin March 10; the second is expected to arrive this month. The remaining six aircraft should be delivered in fiscal 2023, according to the service.

Last year, the Air Force awarded Boeing an estimated $1.2 billion contract to build the multirole F-15EX fighter, using the same design as the F-15, but incorporating modernized electronics and technology. The contract covers eight jets, including initial design; development, test and certification; spare parts and support equipment; training and technical data; and delivery and sustainment costs.

According to Boeing, the F-15EX will be able to "launch hypersonic weapons up to 22 feet long and weighing up to 7,000 pounds." The company has said the fighter will be equipped with improved avionics and radars and can carry more than two dozen air-to-air missiles. By comparison, F-15s can carry a mixed load of four AIM-9 Sidewinder and four AIM-120 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile, or eight AMRAAMs.

Equipped with "the world's fastest mission computer," the F-15EX will also feature the Eagle Passive/Active Warning and Survivability System, or EPAWSS, which will heighten its threat assessment abilities and survivability with advanced electronic warfare technology, Boeing said in its release.

The first eight F-15EX aircraft will be based at Eglin because of the testing wing at the base. Following operational tests at Eglin, the first plane will be operated by the Air National Guard, Loh said.

The service has said the aircraft's most significant upgrade will be its open mission systems architecture, allowing software to be upgraded and installed more easily. Officials voiced concerns in 2017 about the aging F-15.

"We are already having serious problems with that airframe, with metal fatigue within the longerons on the side of the aircraft," then-Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson said during a May 2019 forum. Richardson on Wednesday said that 75% of the older F-15 C/D fleet is flying "well beyond" its service life.The service has more than 230 C and D models in its inventory, with an average lifespan of 35 years.

The Air Force expects to keep a mix of fourth- and fifth-generation aircraft through the 2030s, officials have said.

In 2019, senior defense officials with the Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation office said they opted to pursue the F-15EX because the aircraft would help keep a diverse and "robust industrial base" while providing "a higher-capacity" combination alongside the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. The Air Force intends to build an inventory of at least 144 F-15EX aircraft over the next decade, but the contract with Boeing gives the Air Force the option to purchase up to 200.

The service is developing a "TacAir study," which will determine the right mix of aircraft for the future inventory and assess how future fighter concepts will fit into the current mix of fourth- and fifth-generation fighters.

Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles "CQ" Brown said in February this could include bringing on another new fighter jet to replace the 40-year-old F-16.

-- Oriana Pawlyk can be reached at oriana.pawlyk@military.com. Follow her on Twitter at @Oriana0214.
Offline

basher54321

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2233
  • Joined: 02 Feb 2014, 15:43

Unread post07 Apr 2021, 18:09

Was thinking that perhaps that was April the 1st not the 7th but here we are.

Typically II denoted a totally different aircraft but not anymore it seems - just wham on some roundels and new Engines - should be on at least Fighting Falcon IV by now.



April 7, 2021 | By Brian W. Everstine

The Air Force’s newest fighter jet has a name: F-15EX Eagle II. The service unveiled the name of the jet during an April 7 ceremony at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla.

The Air National Guard will be the first to receive the new jet operationally. ANG Director Lt. Gen. Michael A. Loh said during the ceremony the F-15EX’s improvements will be key to its mission of homeland defense.

https://www.airforcemag.com/f-15ex-named-the-eagle-ii/

When Obi Wan logged onto Twitter: "You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious"
Offline

zero-one

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2405
  • Joined: 23 Jul 2013, 16:19
  • Location: New Jersey

Unread post08 Apr 2021, 07:17

2 nit picky problems I have with this.

1. It's basically just an F-15QA, so do we rename those into Eagle 2s as well. Usually, a new name is given to a new aircraft. The FH-1 Phantom is different from the F-4 Phantom 2. The P-38 Lighting is not the F-35 Lightning 2.

2. When will the airforce learn that putting "two" in the name basically means no one will use it. Nobody calls the F-4, the Phantom 2, its just Phantom or Rhino. No one calls the F-35 the Lighting 2, they call it fat amy
Offline

hornetfinn

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 3456
  • Joined: 13 Mar 2013, 08:31
  • Location: Finland

Unread post09 Apr 2021, 09:26

Maybe they meant it to be "Eagle Too"... :wink:

Why not use something like "Super Eagle" (like SH) or "Golden Eagle" (I know it's already used).
Offline

mixelflick

Elite 4K

Elite 4K

  • Posts: 4333
  • Joined: 20 Mar 2010, 10:26
  • Location: Parts Unknown

Unread post09 Apr 2021, 14:41

Weak name IMO. Really weak, and unbecoming for such a storied airframe..

I prefer Super Eagle, as its much more fitting and has precedent (aka Super Hornet). I'm no fan of the latter, but at least the Navy got the name right. USAF really blew it here, as they did with buying the aircraft itself vs. more F-35's.

On a positive note, at least they're consistent..
Offline

magnum4469

Active Member

Active Member

  • Posts: 118
  • Joined: 18 Aug 2007, 18:27

Unread post09 Apr 2021, 22:52

The AF has a tradition of worthless names that don't stick, take the "Fighting Falcon"... Nobody calls it that, especially the pilots who just call it the Viper. I'm sure the pilots will come up with a name more suitable for the EX just like they did for the F-16 Viper...
Offline
User avatar

jetblast16

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 781
  • Joined: 23 Aug 2004, 00:12
  • Location: USA

Unread post10 Apr 2021, 01:34

"Fighting Falcon"


I personally always loved that name. Viper is cool too, though :D
Have F110, Block 70, will travel
Offline

wrightwing

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 3724
  • Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 15:22

Unread post10 Apr 2021, 19:05

zero-one wrote:2 nit picky problems I have with this.

1. It's basically just an F-15QA, so do we rename those into Eagle 2s as well. Usually, a new name is given to a new aircraft. The FH-1 Phantom is different from the F-4 Phantom 2. The P-38 Lighting is not the F-35 Lightning 2.




The QA doesn't have EPAWWS and a few other US specific features. They're very similar, but not identical.
Offline

Fox1

Active Member

Active Member

  • Posts: 202
  • Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 04:16

Unread post10 Apr 2021, 20:33

They can officially name it whatever they want. But it is, was and will always remain just the "Eagle". Being a new model of an existing design, there is no sensible reason for the II in the designation. Using that is as retarded as it would have been to call the C model something other than Eagle when it went into service.
Offline
User avatar

jetblast16

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 781
  • Joined: 23 Aug 2004, 00:12
  • Location: USA

Unread post11 Apr 2021, 01:57

The more I thought about it, I believe they should have named the newer Eagle the: F-15F
Have F110, Block 70, will travel
Offline

madrat

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2928
  • Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 03:12

Unread post12 Apr 2021, 11:47

War Eagle or Super Eagle are far better than Eagle II or Eagle 2.0, whatever namesake they intended.
Offline

zero-one

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2405
  • Joined: 23 Jul 2013, 16:19
  • Location: New Jersey

Unread post12 Apr 2021, 12:49

magnum4469 wrote:The AF has a tradition of worthless names that don't stick, take the "Fighting Falcon"...


There are some few notable exceptions.
Mustang
Eagle
Raptor

Basically you need to be a badass plane with a badass name, then it sticks

Return to Modern Military Aircraft

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests