J-20 goes operational
- Elite 2K
- Posts: 2310
- Joined: 27 Feb 2008, 23:40
- Location: Serbia, Belgrade
I really don't see any significant acceleration of J-31, look J-20, dozen prototypes were build, and they delivered dozen J-20 to unit, while J-31 had only two prototypes very different to be clear. So they need to speed it up a lot to match J-20 development phase.
And there is engine problem.
And there is engine problem.
- Elite 5K
- Posts: 9792
- Joined: 19 Dec 2005, 04:14
milosh wrote:I really don't see any significant acceleration of J-31, look J-20, dozen prototypes were build, and they delivered dozen J-20 to unit, while J-31 had only two prototypes very different to be clear. So they need to speed it up a lot to match J-20 development phase.
And there is engine problem.
The have produced several developmental (prototypes) J-31's. Including two of the recently redesign models pictured in the above postings. In addition what engines problems???
- Elite 1K
- Posts: 1692
- Joined: 31 Dec 2010, 00:44
- Location: San Antonio, TX
Isn't J-31/FC-31 made by Shenyang and not AVIC (Chengdu)?
Who said China has same requirements and goals as US?
Who said China has same requirements and goals as US?
- Elite 3K
- Posts: 3060
- Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 02:41
- Location: Singapore
There are only 2 J-31s sighted, both of which flew. The first sighted in 2012 was numbered “31001” which is not a unit but was suggested as a cheeky reference to 31 Oct. The second was sighted in late 2016 in LRIP yellow. No other units have been sighted (table top units for airshow displays excluded). As Milosh has pointed out, by this time of the J-20 development, there were a lot more J-20s already sighted.
There aren’t actually any engine issues associated with the RD-93. China bought quite a number for the JF-17 production and certainly no issues encountered since JF-17s are already into Block 3. Milosh is probably referring to the WS-13 Taishan engine development. It has taken quite a while and was slated for JF-17 use but Pakistan has not adopted this just yet. I think the 2nd J-31 is using the WS-13 engine which may explain the long timing difference between the 1st and 2nd J-31. The LRIP J-20s are using the AL-31F engines, not the indigenous engine so it might be a case of the Government prioritizing the J-20 program.
@DR - Shenyang aircraft corporation is a subsidiary of AVIC. So is Chengdu.
There aren’t actually any engine issues associated with the RD-93. China bought quite a number for the JF-17 production and certainly no issues encountered since JF-17s are already into Block 3. Milosh is probably referring to the WS-13 Taishan engine development. It has taken quite a while and was slated for JF-17 use but Pakistan has not adopted this just yet. I think the 2nd J-31 is using the WS-13 engine which may explain the long timing difference between the 1st and 2nd J-31. The LRIP J-20s are using the AL-31F engines, not the indigenous engine so it might be a case of the Government prioritizing the J-20 program.
@DR - Shenyang aircraft corporation is a subsidiary of AVIC. So is Chengdu.
- Elite 5K
- Posts: 9792
- Joined: 19 Dec 2005, 04:14
disconnectedradical wrote:Isn't J-31/FC-31 made by Shenyang and not AVIC (Chengdu)?
Who said China has same requirements and goals as US?
YES
NOBODY
- Elite 5K
- Posts: 9792
- Joined: 19 Dec 2005, 04:14
weasel1962 wrote:There are only 2 J-31s sighted, both of which flew. The first sighted in 2012 was numbered “31001” which is not a unit but was suggested as a cheeky reference to 31 Oct. The second was sighted in late 2016 in LRIP yellow. No other units have been sighted (table top units for airshow displays excluded). As Milosh has pointed out, by this time of the J-20 development, there were a lot more J-20s already sighted.
There aren’t actually any engine issues associated with the RD-93. China bought quite a number for the JF-17 production and certainly no issues encountered since JF-17s are already into Block 3. Milosh is probably referring to the WS-13 Taishan engine development. It has taken quite a while and was slated for JF-17 use but Pakistan has not adopted this just yet. I think the 2nd J-31 is using the WS-13 engine which may explain the long timing difference between the 1st and 2nd J-31. The LRIP J-20s are using the AL-31F engines, not the indigenous engine so it might be a case of the Government prioritizing the J-20 program.
@DR - Shenyang aircraft corporation is a subsidiary of AVIC. So is Chengdu.
China has built two prototypes of the First Generation and Second Generation.
1st Generation (31001)
2nd Generation (V2)*
*Note: Some sources have reported that another second generation J-31 has flown. Yet, I haven't see any credible sources to support that??? Nonetheless, V2 was powered by the WS-13E and a number of eyewitnesses state that it was totally smokeless......
- Elite 5K
- Posts: 9792
- Joined: 19 Dec 2005, 04:14
BTW I never stated that the J-31 as far along in development or as mature as the J-20. I just simply stated that the J-31 is critical to the future of the PLAAF and PLAN....."IMHO"
- Elite 5K
- Posts: 5184
- Joined: 13 Mar 2013, 08:31
- Location: Finland
weasel1962 wrote:There aren’t actually any engine issues associated with the RD-93. China bought quite a number for the JF-17 production and certainly no issues encountered since JF-17s are already into Block 3. Milosh is probably referring to the WS-13 Taishan engine development. It has taken quite a while and was slated for JF-17 use but Pakistan has not adopted this just yet. I think the 2nd J-31 is using the WS-13 engine which may explain the long timing difference between the 1st and 2nd J-31. The LRIP J-20s are using the AL-31F engines, not the indigenous engine so it might be a case of the Government prioritizing the J-20 program.
I think there are several engine issues with the RD-93 specifically with J-31. Not that the engine itself is bad, but it's just a 1970s basic design with some modernization. It's not a 5th gen engine for 5th gen fighter. It has no stealth features and also gives J-31 rather poor T/W ratio, especially on dry thrust. While empty weight of J-31 is not known, it seems rather unlikely that it's lighter than F-35 for example.
- Elite 3K
- Posts: 3060
- Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 02:41
- Location: Singapore
hornetfinn wrote:weasel1962 wrote:There aren’t actually any engine issues associated with the RD-93. China bought quite a number for the JF-17 production and certainly no issues encountered since JF-17s are already into Block 3. Milosh is probably referring to the WS-13 Taishan engine development. It has taken quite a while and was slated for JF-17 use but Pakistan has not adopted this just yet. I think the 2nd J-31 is using the WS-13 engine which may explain the long timing difference between the 1st and 2nd J-31. The LRIP J-20s are using the AL-31F engines, not the indigenous engine so it might be a case of the Government prioritizing the J-20 program.
I think there are several engine issues with the RD-93 specifically with J-31. Not that the engine itself is bad, but it's just a 1970s basic design with some modernization. It's not a 5th gen engine for 5th gen fighter. It has no stealth features and also gives J-31 rather poor T/W ratio, especially on dry thrust. While empty weight of J-31 is not known, it seems rather unlikely that it's lighter than F-35 for example.
Same goes for the AL-31F on the J-20. Its not easy to design a fifth gen engine.
- Elite 2K
- Posts: 2310
- Joined: 27 Feb 2008, 23:40
- Location: Serbia, Belgrade
weasel1962 wrote:Same goes for the AL-31F on the J-20. Its not easy to design a fifth gen engine.
But you can replace AL-31 with 117 or future Izd.30 engine that luxury you don't have with fighter which use RD-33 based engine.
- Newbie
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 09 Feb 2018, 10:09
Interesting tidbit on engine tech from China
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/china-talks-s ... 44775.html?
"China is in talks to sell Germany state-of-the-art machinery and technology critical in the manufacture of high-performance jet engines,"
I'm shocked to see them sell to Germany and not the other way around
Article also mentions a WS-15 engine thats planned for the J20
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/china-talks-s ... 44775.html?
"China is in talks to sell Germany state-of-the-art machinery and technology critical in the manufacture of high-performance jet engines,"
I'm shocked to see them sell to Germany and not the other way around
Article also mentions a WS-15 engine thats planned for the J20
zoomie289 wrote:Interesting tidbit on engine tech from China
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/china-talks-s ... 44775.html?
"China is in talks to sell Germany state-of-the-art machinery and technology critical in the manufacture of high-performance jet engines,"
I'm shocked to see them sell to Germany and not the other way around
Article also mentions a WS-15 engine thats planned for the J20
What's the last fighter turbine engine Germany produced? Exactly.
"There I was. . ."
- Elite 5K
- Posts: 5184
- Joined: 13 Mar 2013, 08:31
- Location: Finland
LOL at the idea that Germany would need jet engine technology from China. They have company like MTU Aero Engines AG, which is producing major parts for pretty modern engines like EJ200 and F414. Chinese companies have not produced anything better than copies of 1970s AL-31 and RD-33 really. It doesn't sound very plausible that they could offer anything for the Germans in this field. Maybe Chinese should try to sell their technology to P&W, GE and RR also?
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 14 Dec 2017, 20:22
China declares that the J-20 is now actively deployed, and combat capable.
http://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomac ... ombat-duty
http://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomac ... ombat-duty
- Elite 3K
- Posts: 3060
- Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 02:41
- Location: Singapore
hornetfinn wrote:LOL at the idea that Germany would need jet engine technology from China. They have company like MTU Aero Engines AG, which is producing major parts for pretty modern engines like EJ200 and F414. Chinese companies have not produced anything better than copies of 1970s AL-31 and RD-33 really. It doesn't sound very plausible that they could offer anything for the Germans in this field. Maybe Chinese should try to sell their technology to P&W, GE and RR also?
Not really an issue. China has been manufacturing engine parts for quite some time. Chinese parts end up even in US aircraft over the years...
https://www.rt.com/news/us-air-force-co ... onics-879/
https://www.cnbc.com/2014/01/03/us-put- ... ogram.html
In this German case, its blades.
http://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/ ... gy-germany
Its a bit eye popping because one part that China was not known to have was good metallurgy (including Russian) leading to a shorter engine life. However, its easy to underestimate Chinese R&D but when the stats are analysed, its not really that surprising.
https://chinapower.csis.org/china-resea ... pment-rnd/
http://bruegel.org/2017/08/china-is-the ... owerhouse/
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests