F-14 and F-15 posted Mach speeds

Cold war, Korea, Vietnam, and Desert Storm - up to and including for example the A-10, F-15, Mirage 200, MiG-29, and F-18.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

rowbeartoe

Newbie

Newbie

  • Posts: 19
  • Joined: 30 Nov 2016, 06:30

Unread post09 Aug 2019, 04:27

HI Everyone.

Why does the F-14 have a claimed top speed of Mach 2.34 and the F-15 Mach 2.5 or in some cases 2.5+? Wouldn't it just make more sense for the F-14 to say Mach 2.3+?
The F-15 has a claimed speed of Mach 1.2 or 1.21 at sea level. Notice it doesn't say Mach 1.2+. Are these speeds at Level flight or on a dive at altitude? Similarly I've seen the F-16 posted as Mach 2+

I've also seen speeds posted in an actual number- F-15 at 1650 mph at above 36,000 feet or 915mph at 1000ft. The F-16 I've seen posted as 1320mph at altitude and 920mph at sea level.

Of interest- I also read the F-14 eventually removed the variable swept intake- giving it a lower top speed?

From what I've read on here, these Jets apparently never reached these top speeds in actual use anyways- but it's still fascinating to market these speeds at altitude and sea level. Why are they sometimes so precise?

Thank you.
Offline

h-bomb

Senior member

Senior member

  • Posts: 303
  • Joined: 26 Apr 2009, 20:07
  • Location: South Central USA

Unread post09 Aug 2019, 06:50

rowbeartoe wrote:HI Everyone.
Wouldn't it just make more sense for the F-14 to say Mach 2.3+?

Of interest- I also read the F-14 eventually removed the variable swept intake- giving it a lower top speed?

Thank you.


The 2.34 was politics so it was "faster" than the F-4s Mach "2.23". When Hahn converted from the F-4E to the F-16A they took the best engine they could find, and stuffed then in the same airframe. The Wing King and a few others went to the North Sea and tried to reach 2.23, and no one got it. So I take the "Top Speed" of the F-4 and F-14 with a grain of salt.
(Google F-4A and compare the cockpit/nose to the F-4B. Everything from the inlets forward changed. The F-4A set the official top speed)

The F-14 always flew with the external fuel tanks. These are not drop tanks! So the F-14 could not use its theoretical top speed. They were fast enough without the variable intake, and it saved money and man hours. Lots of man hours.
Offline

sprstdlyscottsmn

Elite 4K

Elite 4K

  • Posts: 4331
  • Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 01:24
  • Location: Phoenix, Az, USA

Unread post09 Aug 2019, 14:46

I can assure you the F-14 tanks can be dropped.
"Spurts"

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic
-FMS Systems Engineer
Offline

tomcattech

Enthusiast

Enthusiast

  • Posts: 22
  • Joined: 30 Mar 2017, 18:11

Unread post09 Aug 2019, 15:26

sprstdlyscottsmn wrote:I can assure you the F-14 tanks can be dropped.


Correct

On Tomcat speed:
The F-14A was listed with top speed of 2.34, but actually made 2.41 during flight test (the RIO was tweaking the ramps via special control box in the test article).
A 1.88 limit in the B/D was an artificial one to insure the aircraft would remain stable with an engine out...
Also note that the B/D inlets were rescheduled for optimum transonic performance and the aircraft allegedly were somewhat slower than the A above 1.6.

Glove vanes were fixed in the later airplanes.
They deployed around 1.3 in the A to reduce trim drag by causing the aerodynamic center to move forward, thus improving acceleration.
With the 30% increase of thrust they weren't deemed necessary.

FYI, the F-18E/F, which appears to have a similar inlet, has a fixed one which does limit performance.

On a different note... Pax River had some makeshift tanks with cameras in them to monitor bomb separation during "bombcat" tests.

Image

Image
Hornets by mandate. Tomcats by choice!!
Offline

mixelflick

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 3315
  • Joined: 20 Mar 2010, 10:26
  • Location: Parts Unknown
  • Warnings: 3

Unread post10 Aug 2019, 14:50

I can't recall where I read this, but supposedly an early F-14 in testing hit mach 2.6.

I found that hard to believe, but the author was pretty adamant. In the real world, I'd say the Eagle and Tomcat were evenly matched in speed, albeit I have heard many an F-15 driver say, "We don't get slow with the gents in F-14's"...
Offline

sprstdlyscottsmn

Elite 4K

Elite 4K

  • Posts: 4331
  • Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 01:24
  • Location: Phoenix, Az, USA

Unread post10 Aug 2019, 21:43

mixelflick wrote: "We don't get slow with the gents in F-14's"...

because the F-14 has superior low speed lift capability and a great pilot can point the nose wherever they want... while a nugget will end up only pointing at the ground.
"Spurts"

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic
-FMS Systems Engineer
Offline

f-16adf

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 685
  • Joined: 19 Dec 2016, 17:46

Unread post11 Aug 2019, 16:00

That good old quote from that great jet book:
Attachments
F-14 acm.jpg
Offline

sprstdlyscottsmn

Elite 4K

Elite 4K

  • Posts: 4331
  • Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 01:24
  • Location: Phoenix, Az, USA

Unread post12 Aug 2019, 04:54

I have a copy of that book.
"Spurts"

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic
-FMS Systems Engineer
Offline
User avatar

edpop

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 504
  • Joined: 02 Feb 2008, 20:43
  • Location: Macomb, Michigan

Unread post12 Aug 2019, 05:05

In one of my F-15 books it said it could exceed Mach 1 going vertical.....................
Vietnam veteran (Combat Engineer) 1967
Retired from Chrysler Engineering

Return to Military Aircraft of the Cold War

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests