Flying Missile Rail 2017

Sub-scale and Full-Scale Aerial Targets and RPAs - Remotely-Piloted Aircraft
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

neptune

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2885
  • Joined: 24 Oct 2008, 00:03
  • Location: Houston

Unread post07 Sep 2017, 16:33

http://alert5.com/2017/09/07/darpas-fly ... more-64806

DARPA’s Flying Missile Rail

DARPA is showing an interesting project for a Flying Missile Rail (FMR) that carries at least one AIM-120 air-to-air missile and can fly on its own for 20 minutes at Mach 0.9.

Video Player

image: http://alert5.com/wp-content/uploads/20 ... humb42.jpg



Video: DARPA

The FMR is to be carried on hardpoints certified for 2,000lb weapons. DARPA is looking at mounting it on the F-16 and F/A-18. The objective is to churn out 500 such rails in a month. The research agency is not mandating any manufacturing process.

Read more at http://alert5.com/2017/09/07/darpas-fly ... xAITgzV.99
:)
Online

SpudmanWP

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 7834
  • Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
  • Location: California

Unread post07 Sep 2017, 16:44

I lol'd when I saw the flying wing layout... No way that's hitting mach 0.9

Here is the direct Youtube link



More info

https://sbir_industryday.darpa.mil/Topi ... _Jones.pdf

https://sbir_industryday.darpa.mil/Pres ... _Jones.pdf

Image

The only way I see this as happening is an RPV shaped like a Tomahawk with a high mounted wing, top mounted intake, and the two AMRAAMs mounted in semi-conformal rails at the 4 o'clock and 7 o'clock positions. Being semi-conformal reduces drag and more importantly reduces asymmetrical drag once the 1st AMRAAM is launched when the RPV is flying on it's own.
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
Offline
User avatar

sferrin

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 4775
  • Joined: 22 Jul 2005, 03:23

Unread post07 Sep 2017, 19:15

Definitely good for a laugh. Unfortunately the money isn't being spent on a more practical solution.
"There I was. . ."
Offline
User avatar

count_to_10

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 3255
  • Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 15:38

Unread post07 Sep 2017, 22:13

Totally real. Here is the SBIR topic:
https://sbir.defensebusiness.org/topics?topicId=28896

The concept they show in the slides/video look all wrong, though. It needs to have a low physical cross section, probably folding wings, and really should carry the missiles conformally.
Einstein got it backward: one cannot prevent a war without preparing for it.

Uncertainty: Learn it, love it, live it.
Offline
User avatar

count_to_10

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 3255
  • Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 15:38

Unread post07 Sep 2017, 22:15

sferrin wrote:Definitely good for a laugh. Unfortunately the money isn't being spent on a more practical solution.

It's a $220,000 project (for now, and per awardee). An actual missile costs more than they are spending at this stage.
Einstein got it backward: one cannot prevent a war without preparing for it.

Uncertainty: Learn it, love it, live it.
Offline

madrat

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1956
  • Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 03:12

Unread post08 Sep 2017, 03:41

It's like a Bomarc missile under each wing. If two AIM-120 is possible, then surely 3-4 shorter CUDA-like missiles would allow you to literally box in any target. The other thought is a solid rocket booster wouldn't be easily hidden, but perhaps a miniature turbojet could boost it to 100,000 feet to release a spread of missiles for maximum effect. Even a pair of missiles released at high subsonic speeds in the stratosphere would add tremendously to the range for the missiles to bracket a target while maintaining kinetic energy as it approaches it's target. Meteor becomes less interesting.
Offline
User avatar

popcorn

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 7505
  • Joined: 24 Sep 2008, 08:55

Unread post08 Sep 2017, 04:03

At a targeted price of US$2M apiece these would appear to offer more bang for the buck.


http://www.popularmechanics.com/militar ... ber-drone/
"When a fifth-generation fighter meets a fourth-generation fighter—the [latter] dies,”
CSAF Gen. Mark Welsh
Offline
User avatar

rheonomic

Forum Veteran

Forum Veteran

  • Posts: 629
  • Joined: 30 Apr 2015, 03:44

Unread post08 Sep 2017, 04:15

This seems pointless compared to something like LCAAT. From the presentation it seems this is more of a manufacturing tech thing anyway... "Operational analysis and effectiveness are not a part of any deliverable..."
"You could do that, but it would be wrong."
Offline
User avatar

sferrin

Elite 3K

Elite 3K

  • Posts: 4775
  • Joined: 22 Jul 2005, 03:23

Unread post08 Sep 2017, 13:58

madrat wrote:It's like a Bomarc missile under each wing.


Yeah, a subsonic, 25,000ft, 20 minute endurance drone is exactly like a Mach 3+, 100,000ft, 440 mile range missile. :roll:
"There I was. . ."
Offline

eloise

Elite 1K

Elite 1K

  • Posts: 1515
  • Joined: 27 Mar 2015, 16:05

Unread post03 Dec 2018, 08:43

madrat wrote:It's like a Bomarc missile under each wing. If two AIM-120 is possible, then surely 3-4 shorter CUDA-like missiles would allow you to literally box in any target. The other thought is a solid rocket booster wouldn't be easily hidden, but perhaps a miniature turbojet could boost it to 100,000 feet to release a spread of missiles for maximum effect. Even a pair of missiles released at high subsonic speeds in the stratosphere would add tremendously to the range for the missiles to bracket a target while maintaining kinetic energy as it approaches it's target. Meteor becomes less interesting.

I think it is super awesome
20 minute at Mach 0.9 is around 318 km
FMR produces little to no IR signature after launched from mother aircraft
You can attack from extremely long range, yet keep the high PK of AIM-120 launched at close range
You can arrange attack from multiple direction

Return to Drones

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests