IRST targeting range?

New and old developments in aviation technology.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline

armedupdate

Senior member

Senior member

  • Posts: 473
  • Joined: 05 Aug 2015, 21:11

Unread post26 Apr 2018, 02:32

Are there targeting range to IRSTs? Lets say it spots a target head on at 50 km. Using triangulation can it target at those distances?

I remember the targeting range against a stationary target in the Chinese EOTS version to be 50 km despite it can see out to 100 km.

One thing that seems to concern me is that even if the target is spotted and ID'd using IFF, is the amount of vapor in the atmosphere is going to throw the actual coordinate way off due to refraction. IR missiles have this problem as well however they can correct it when they are approaching the target.
Online

SpudmanWP

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 8378
  • Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
  • Location: California

Unread post26 Apr 2018, 03:05

An IRST can determine rage in one of several ways.

1. Single-Ship triangulation: In a head-on scenario this is more problematic than a side shot.

2. Multi-Ship triangulation: Mutch faster and more accurate than #1 and no real limit to range. More an issue of ID'ing the target rather than range.

3. Laser range-finder: Quick and accurate but range limited. Public Russian numbers have a number of 20km for the laser.

4. Shape ID: If the target plane can be ID'd then the range can be estimated based on the length of the shape.
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
Offline

armedupdate

Senior member

Senior member

  • Posts: 473
  • Joined: 05 Aug 2015, 21:11

Unread post26 Apr 2018, 03:17

SpudmanWP wrote:An IRST can determine rage in one of several ways.

1. Single-Ship triangulation: In a head-on scenario this is more problematic than a side shot.

2. Multi-Ship triangulation: Mutch faster and more accurate than #1 and no real limit to range. More an issue of ID'ing the target rather than range.

3. Laser range-finder: Quick and accurate but range limited. Public Russian numbers have a number of 20km for the laser.

4. Shape ID: If the target plane can be ID'd then the range can be estimated based on the length of the shape.

Multi-ship triangulation is the best way practically. LRFs are limited by range, shape ID is too iffy due to pixels count being inaccurate, and single ship is not good against moving targets.
Offline

hornetfinn

Elite 2K

Elite 2K

  • Posts: 2769
  • Joined: 13 Mar 2013, 08:31
  • Location: Finland

Unread post26 Apr 2018, 11:26

SpudmanWP wrote:3. Laser range-finder: Quick and accurate but range limited. Public Russian numbers have a number of 20km for the laser.


High-powered diode-pumped lasers can have higher range than that, something like 50 km is possible depending on target features. Naturally target reflectivity and atmospheric visibility affect the range a lot.

Interesting datasheet about L3 diode-pumped laser performance:
http://www2.l3t.com/alst/pdfs/datasheets/DP_ELRF-V.pdf
Online

SpudmanWP

Elite 5K

Elite 5K

  • Posts: 8378
  • Joined: 12 Oct 2006, 19:18
  • Location: California

Unread post26 Apr 2018, 16:53

US systems don't advertise range so I was limited to stating the range of Russian systems.
Attachments
qrkpwi[1].jpg
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
Offline

armedupdate

Senior member

Senior member

  • Posts: 473
  • Joined: 05 Aug 2015, 21:11

Unread post26 Apr 2018, 22:41

Does Russian figures 20 km mean with triangulation or just LRF?
Offline

sprstdlyscottsmn

Elite 4K

Elite 4K

  • Posts: 4327
  • Joined: 10 Mar 2006, 01:24
  • Location: Phoenix, Az, USA

Unread post27 Apr 2018, 13:38

That is the LRF range of a single OLS system.
"Spurts"

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic
-FMS Systems Engineer

Return to Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests